Customer area
Brighton 01273 685 888
Commercial
searchSearch
call-answerCall Us
new-email-envelopeEnquiry
list-menuMenu
×
×
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • ×

    Healys Solicitors’ Commercial Team is a dynamic and expanding area of the Firm.

    The Commercial Team offers an extensive variety of services to individuals and companies alike operating across a wide spectrum of sectors including financial services, property investment, transport, telecommunications and IT.

    We provide a full-service for the life-cycle of a transaction from the initial planning stage, through drafting and negotiation, culminating in the implementation of the relevant contracts and documents.

    The Commercial Team is equally adept at dealing with complex shareholders agreements as it is advising on straightforward business terms and conditions. Our goal remains the same, to deliver appropriate, creative and cost-effective solutions to our clients in order that they can operate their business without exposing themselves to avoidable risks.

    A fee basis is agreed in advance of all work we undertake.

    Call Us Today
    Call our London office on 020 7822 4000 or our Brighton office on 01273 685 888. You can also contact us online.
    Call Us Today
    London: 020 7822 4000 Brighton: 01273 685 888 Or you can contact us online: Contact Us
    Commercial capabilities
    Commercial experiences
    Commercial insights
    Commercial awards
    Commercial news
    • Case Study – DP v Barts Health NHS Trust

      28th May 2020

      Jonathan acted on behalf of a 23 year old female in relation to her claim for clinical negligence that happened in 2015 at Whipps Cross Hospital in London. The Claimant had a relevant past gynaecological and obstetric history of a previous caesarean section in 2013 and previous laparotomy for ovarian cystectomy at 10 years of age. This was classified as a high risk pregnancy and the Claimant was referred to a Consultant in the Antenatal Clinic at Whipps Cross Hospital for review. The Claimant had elected to have a caesarean section. The Claimant had previously undergone an emergency lower segment caesarean section due to a failure to progress when having her first child. Continue reading »