Healys experienced and approachable medical negligence solicitors could help you make a claim for cosmetic surgery-related injuries.
One procedure for which you could claim compensation if it has been performed negligently, is a chemical peel.
A chemical peel is the term used to refer to when chemicals are applied to the skin to remove layers of skin cells and help improve an individual’s complexion.
There are three types of chemical peel – superficial, medium, and deep.
A superficial peel is the mildest type of chemical peel. A mix of chemicals is applied to a person’s face using a sponge, cotton pad, or brush. No anaesthesia is necessary and patients should only feel a mild tingling or stinging sensation. Any reddening of the skin, or peeling and flaking, should pass in a few days.
Medium peels penetrate more deeply. The chemicals used will result in a deliberate second-degree burn. A sedative or painkiller will probably be offered to the patient before the procedure. Skin will feel tight, and will be red and swollen for several days, after which a crust will form and some brown blotches might appear. Five to seven days after the initial treatment, new skin should begin to form.
A deep chemical peel will also cause a second-degree burn. Severe redness, swelling, burning, and throbbing may be experienced by the patient. Potentially, their eyelids may be swollen shut as a reaction to the chemicals used. Painkillers will be provided, and dressings should be applied to the face following the procedure. Cysts or white spots could be present for several weeks.
As with all cosmetic procedures, there are risks to having this procedure performed. The patient should have a consultation before being booked in for the procedure, where the risks will be explained to them.
Unwanted side-effects from a chemical peel may include scarring, changes in skin colour, skin infections, and heart, kidney, or liver damage.
If you have sustained unacceptable cosmetic surgery-related injuries due to the negligence of a medical professional, you could be entitled to compensation.
Contact Healys today for advice and representation.
19th February 2019
A supermarket worker who cut her thumb while working on the fish counter has secured compensation from her employer after her injury led to her developing a serious infection. Continue reading »
Everyone has a right to complain about their neighbours’ behaviour, but where such complaints are unjustified and take the form of harassment the consequences can be severe. In one such case, a flat dweller who made a fellow resident’s life a misery was ordered to pay him almost £100,000 in damages. Continue reading »
18th February 2019
Consumers have a right to expect that the goods they purchase are of satisfactory quality and do not expose them to risk of injury, as was illustrated by a case in which a homeowner won the right to compensation after a furniture unit came apart and fell on his foot. Continue reading »
11th February 2019
Opticians don’t just sell glasses, they perform an important role in spotting potential problems that need to be referred to a doctor. In a case on point, a schoolboy who was left almost blind after an optician failed to detect a benign brain tumour won almost £500,000 in compensation. Continue reading »
21st January 2019
One of the most tragic effects of serious head injuries can be that victims lose the ability to make rational decisions and can be intensely vulnerable to exploitation by others. However, a case in which a crash victim won seven-figure compensation showed that specialist lawyers can see to it that measures are put in place to provide protection. Continue reading »
23rd November 2018
A radical proposal for cycling awareness has been unveiled by the government. The plans include a series of measures to improve safety for vulnerable road users, and to encourage and support cycling. The aim is to reduce the significant number of serious and fatal accidents suffered by cyclists. Continue reading »
24th July 2017
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced measures to tackle fraudulent sickness claims. Fraudulent claims of food poisoning by holidaymakers which are false or exaggerated claims, could result in British tourists paying higher package holiday prices. Continue reading »
27th February 2017
The last revision of the discount rate was undertaken on 25th June 2001, when it was set at 2.5%. From 20th March 2017, the rate drops from 2.5% to minus 0.75%. It is a change of 3.25 percentage points. Continue reading »
21st January 2016
Jonathan Austen-Jones acted on behalf of the applicant in this case who was the subject of sexual abuse at the hands of his step-father between the ages of about 5 and 7.
An initial application for compensation pursuant to the 1990 Scheme was made in 1992 and in June 1996 he was awarded £10,000.00 in respect of the abuse he had suffered. This award was clearly too low and it appears that no psychiatric evidence was before the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). Continue reading »
Jonathan Austen-Jones acted on behalf of the claimant in her claim for damages for clinical negligence. The claim arose from the tragic loss of her baby’s life as a consequence of the failure of the Defendant Trust, appreciating that baby B had a Group B streptococcus infection at his birth on the night of the 1st January 2009, resulting in baby B’s death at 00.55 hours on the 3rd January 2009. Continue reading »