Have you recently undergone liposuction surgery and suffered injury or illness as a result? If your procedure was carried out at a lower than professional standard, you may be entitled to cosmetic surgery compensation.
Healys has an established track record of helping clients achieve the compensation they deserve in medical negligence cases. Contact us today so that we can start fighting for your cosmetic surgery compensation.
Typically, this form of cosmetic surgery is chosen as an option for weight loss and body sculpting when an individual cannot reduce their fat levels through normal measures such as diet and exercise. Liposuction removes excess fat from certain areas of the body.
Although there are a number of techniques, the most common process begins with an anaesthetic fluid injection to dilute and prepare fat cells for removal and dull the pain. Surgeons then utilise ultrasound technology to break down fat cell structures.
After this procedure, drainage needles may be required to drain fluid pockets from the affected areas. The surgeon then makes an incision and uses vacuum-like equipment to suck out the compromised fat cells.
Although liposuction is generally considered to be safe, the procedure does present some inherent risks. Some of these risks are equal to those found in any other invasive surgical procedures. The common hazards include possible nerve damage, blood clotting, allergic reaction and biological infections. All of these complications present potentially severe consequences. In some cases, they can even cause cardiac arrest, permanent paralysis and brain damage.
All medical centres have a responsibility to check for pre-existing conditions such as heart problems, lung disease and diabetes, so that they can minimize the possibility of these complications, before carrying out liposuction on a patient.
The medical staff must utilise a complete medical questionnaire to identify these issues. They must also provide reasonable explanations of all risks involved to patients. Any necessary medical equipment must be kept on hand to deal with emergencies, if they occur.
The amount of fat removed from the individual is the most important factor in assessing the risk of liposuction procedures. Any amount over 10 pounds greatly increases the risks involved with excessive fat removal.
The surgeon must also use caution when managing the fluid ratio during a liposuction procedure. A miscalculation of this ratio can result in serious complications, such as pulmonary oedema. This complication occurs when fat cells and fluid enter the lungs and can cause respiratory failure.
Cosmetic problems can also occur due to excessive liposuction. Loose, uneven or sagging skin may appear and force further corrective surgery. In some cases, the procedure causes alterations in skin pigmentation. A well-trained, competent cosmetic surgeon should be able to avoid these risks and provide the results that patients want.
24th May 2019
No amount of money can compensate for the loss of a loved one due to someone else’s negligence, but it can at least soften the financial blow. In one case, the widow and four children of a man who was struck down by a hit-and-run driver achieved a seven-figure settlement of their claim. Continue reading »
23rd May 2019
Sums paid in damages to negligence victims may appear large, but the reality is that no amount of money can ever compensate them for what they have lost. A judge acknowledged that sad fact in approving a multi-million-pound payout to a young man who was catastrophically injured in a road crash involving an ambulance. Continue reading »
15th May 2019
The Court of Appeal has rejected arguments put forward by the Royal Opera House (ROH) that a compensation award to a viola player who claimed that his hearing was damaged by exposure to the noise of brass instruments will curtail music making in the UK. Continue reading »
22nd February 2019
Statistics provided by Cancer Research UK indicate that on average 360,000 people are diagnosed with cancer every year in the UK. However, an article that appeared in the Independent newspaper in December 2018, revealed the startling finding that 4 out of every 10 people diagnosed with cancer have been misdiagnosed at least once before the disease was identified. Continue reading »
19th February 2019
Everyone has a right to complain about their neighbours’ behaviour, but where such complaints are unjustified and take the form of harassment the consequences can be severe. In one such case, a flat dweller who made a fellow resident’s life a misery was ordered to pay him almost £100,000 in damages. Continue reading »
23rd November 2018
A radical proposal for cycling awareness has been unveiled by the government. The plans include a series of measures to improve safety for vulnerable road users, and to encourage and support cycling. The aim is to reduce the significant number of serious and fatal accidents suffered by cyclists. Continue reading »
24th July 2017
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced measures to tackle fraudulent sickness claims. Fraudulent claims of food poisoning by holidaymakers which are false or exaggerated claims, could result in British tourists paying higher package holiday prices. Continue reading »
27th February 2017
The last revision of the discount rate was undertaken on 25th June 2001, when it was set at 2.5%. From 20th March 2017, the rate drops from 2.5% to minus 0.75%. It is a change of 3.25 percentage points. Continue reading »
21st January 2016
Jonathan Austen-Jones acted on behalf of the applicant in this case who was the subject of sexual abuse at the hands of his step-father between the ages of about 5 and 7.
An initial application for compensation pursuant to the 1990 Scheme was made in 1992 and in June 1996 he was awarded £10,000.00 in respect of the abuse he had suffered. This award was clearly too low and it appears that no psychiatric evidence was before the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). Continue reading »
Jonathan Austen-Jones acted on behalf of the claimant in her claim for damages for clinical negligence. The claim arose from the tragic loss of her baby’s life as a consequence of the failure of the Defendant Trust, appreciating that baby B had a Group B streptococcus infection at his birth on the night of the 1st January 2009, resulting in baby B’s death at 00.55 hours on the 3rd January 2009. Continue reading »