Have you sustained injuries from acupuncture? If so, you might be entitled to compensation through our expert claims solicitors.
If a patient suffers any form of personal injury, they should seek treatment from a qualified doctor or medical practitioner immediately. Yet, when the effects of conventional healthcare do not seem to have any beneficial effects, individuals may become frustrated and turn to complementary or alternative medicine – such as acupuncture.
According to the NHS, acupuncture is a type of Chinese medicine which involves inserting needles into a patient’s body. By placing these points into certain areas, it has been theorised that practitioners are able to affect nerve endings and muscle tissue, altering the body’s perception of pain. As a result, this therapy is used to treat a range of conditions, such as headaches, anxiety, and asthma.
Despite the supposed benefits, The National Institute of Clinical Excellence states acupuncture is an effective form of treatment for persistent lower back pain only. The NHS adds there is no reliable scientific data which suggests it could benefit many of the ailments which are generally associated with this therapy.
Consequently, the organisation states more research could be necessary in order to better understand how acupuncture works.
Furthermore, although this treatment is recognised by certain bodies, some studies suggest it could carry a variety of health risks.
The NHS states there are various risks associated with acupuncture, such as pain, bleeding, or bruising due to the needles, as well as drowsiness or worsening of a person’s symptoms.
In serious cases, a patient can even contract an infection or experience tissue damage. In this situation, an individual may be entitled to receive compensation through a clinical negligence claim.
In 2012, researchers from the National Patient Safety Agency and the Peninsula Medical School published the results of a study in the International Journal of Risk and Safety Medicine. The research looked at 325 acupuncture-related patient safety incidents which took place between 2009 and 2011. The results suggested this treatment could carry a variety of health risks.
For example, 39 incidents resulted in a patient experiencing conditions such as hot flushes, additional pains, or vomiting, 63 described individuals temporarily losing consciousness, with six of these patients suffering a seizure. Two cases ended in a formal diagnosis of pneumothorax (where a puncture leads to a collapsed lung).
As well as these, and other incidents, there were examples of possible medical negligence where individuals returned home only to find needles still embedded in their skin.
Following these findings, the researchers stated that acupuncture appears to be a “low-harm” treatment when carried out by the NHS. However, an individual may experience a greater risk of serious complications if they seek this form of treatment outside of the organisation.
24th May 2019
No amount of money can compensate for the loss of a loved one due to someone else’s negligence, but it can at least soften the financial blow. In one case, the widow and four children of a man who was struck down by a hit-and-run driver achieved a seven-figure settlement of their claim. Continue reading »
23rd May 2019
Sums paid in damages to negligence victims may appear large, but the reality is that no amount of money can ever compensate them for what they have lost. A judge acknowledged that sad fact in approving a multi-million-pound payout to a young man who was catastrophically injured in a road crash involving an ambulance. Continue reading »
15th May 2019
The Court of Appeal has rejected arguments put forward by the Royal Opera House (ROH) that a compensation award to a viola player who claimed that his hearing was damaged by exposure to the noise of brass instruments will curtail music making in the UK. Continue reading »
22nd February 2019
Statistics provided by Cancer Research UK indicate that on average 360,000 people are diagnosed with cancer every year in the UK. However, an article that appeared in the Independent newspaper in December 2018, revealed the startling finding that 4 out of every 10 people diagnosed with cancer have been misdiagnosed at least once before the disease was identified. Continue reading »
19th February 2019
Everyone has a right to complain about their neighbours’ behaviour, but where such complaints are unjustified and take the form of harassment the consequences can be severe. In one such case, a flat dweller who made a fellow resident’s life a misery was ordered to pay him almost £100,000 in damages. Continue reading »
23rd November 2018
A radical proposal for cycling awareness has been unveiled by the government. The plans include a series of measures to improve safety for vulnerable road users, and to encourage and support cycling. The aim is to reduce the significant number of serious and fatal accidents suffered by cyclists. Continue reading »
24th July 2017
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced measures to tackle fraudulent sickness claims. Fraudulent claims of food poisoning by holidaymakers which are false or exaggerated claims, could result in British tourists paying higher package holiday prices. Continue reading »
27th February 2017
The last revision of the discount rate was undertaken on 25th June 2001, when it was set at 2.5%. From 20th March 2017, the rate drops from 2.5% to minus 0.75%. It is a change of 3.25 percentage points. Continue reading »
21st January 2016
Jonathan Austen-Jones acted on behalf of the applicant in this case who was the subject of sexual abuse at the hands of his step-father between the ages of about 5 and 7.
An initial application for compensation pursuant to the 1990 Scheme was made in 1992 and in June 1996 he was awarded £10,000.00 in respect of the abuse he had suffered. This award was clearly too low and it appears that no psychiatric evidence was before the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). Continue reading »
Jonathan Austen-Jones acted on behalf of the claimant in her claim for damages for clinical negligence. The claim arose from the tragic loss of her baby’s life as a consequence of the failure of the Defendant Trust, appreciating that baby B had a Group B streptococcus infection at his birth on the night of the 1st January 2009, resulting in baby B’s death at 00.55 hours on the 3rd January 2009. Continue reading »